|
6th October 2008 @ 2:37pm |
| Subscribe | Instructions To Authors | Advertising/Supplements | Contact Us | Help |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Volume 15, Number 4, July-August 2008HOT Amyloid heart disease is comparatively rare, frequently missed and often mimics other clinical conditions. It often carries a very poor prognosis. Nonetheless, healthcare professionals should be aware of ‘the amyloidoses’ and advances in their diagnosis and treatment. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:177-8. HOT Managing patients with the various manifestations of coronary heart disease keeps cardiologists busy, whether in out-patients, the cardiac catheter lab or the coronary care unit. There is no doubt that the specialty of cardiology has benefited from drug regulation imposed and supervised by the Food and Drugs Administration and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency – commercial sponsorship may have funded and, to some extent driven, the use of the ‘gold-standard’ double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre clinical trial to test potentially useful drugs, but at least the evidence base for clinical practice is well-founded as a result. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:183–4. EDITORIALCost-effectiveness and use of natriuretic peptides in clinical practice – do we have enough evidence yet?
Clinicians find heart failure difficult to diagnose.1 Confirmation of left ventricular dysfunction (systolic or diastolic) is only possible by cardiac imaging. Recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance have suggested that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal prohormone BNP (NT proBNP) and electrocardiography be used as a diagnostic tool that supports general practitioners (GPs) in their assessment of patients with suspected heart failure.2,3 Despite inclusion in guidelines2,3 uptake of BNP or NT proBNP use has been slow in the National Health Service (NHS). Br J Cardiol 2008;15:179–80. REVIEWCost-consequences analysis of natriuretic peptide assays to refute symptomatic heart failure in primary care In primary care, the significant burden of heart failure is exacerbated by problematic, inaccurate diagnosis that may produce inefficient triaging of patients to echocardiography. UK guidelines recommend using natriuretic peptides in the diagnostic pathway. The costs and consequences of providing a definitive diagnosis for symptomatic heart failure have not been established for peptide testing in primary care. We provide a cost-consequence analysis to compare alternative diagnostic strategies for symptomatic heart failure patients presenting to their GP. Health economic evaluation using decision-tree modelling taking a cohort of patients presenting in primary care with symptomatic heart failure to a definitive diagnosis was performed. The model compared a diagnostic strategy using electrocardiograms (ECGs) interpreted by consultants with the use of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) assays. The base-case used data from the UK Natriuretic Peptide (UKNP) study, which used a ‘point-of-care’ assay. Two alternative scenarios were modelled reflecting data from key studies, as was sensitivity to costs. The model demonstrates that, for the base-case scenario, an initial diagnostic strategy of BNP is superior to ECG in terms of diagnosis of symptomatic heart failure in patients presenting in primary care, despite slightly more initial false negatives and a marginally higher cost. The alternative scenarios and sensitivity analyses show that the results are very sensitive to test accuracies and costs, but that, under plausible assumptions, BNP could be both cheaper and clinically superior. The model suggests that, despite parameter uncertainty, the adoption of BNP in primary care is likely to be clinically preferable, be more satisfactory for most patients, and lead to fewer unnecessary echocardiography referrals, at a very small increase in cost. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:199–204. HOT A clinical audit of ezetimibe in the treatment of refractory hyperlipidaemia was conducted in 100 high-risk patients who failed to achieve desirable levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol on statins. Of these, 59 had familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), the remainder had other aetiologies (non-FH). The percentage of patients achieving the total and LDL-cholesterol targets of the International Panel on the Management of FH or the Second Joint British Societies’ guidelines in non-FH patients was determined. Ezetimibe significantly decreased mean LDL-cholesterol when used as an adjunct to statins or as monotherapy, from 3.9 to 3.1 mmol/L in FH, from 3.4 to 2.4 mmol/L in non-FH and from 6.0 to 4.4 mmol/L in statin-intolerant patients. The decrease in LDL-cholesterol on statins was inversely correlated with the decrement after adding ezetimibe (r= -0.67, p<0.0001) but 15% of patients showed no further decrease. The percentage of patients achieving target levels of LDL-cholesterol was 27% on statins and 63% on statins plus ezetimibe (p<0.007). None of the non-FH patients achieved target levels on statins but 33% did so when ezetimibe was added (p<0.001). Ezetimibe is an effective adjunct to statins for lowering LDL-cholesterol in refractory hyperlipidaemia, except in a minority of patients, and is a useful substitute in statin-intolerant subjects. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:205–9. REVIEWClinical experience with prolonged-release nicotinic acid in statin-treated patients managed in Ireland
Nicotinic acid (for treatment of low high-density lipoprotein [HDL]) combined with a statin has been shown previously to improve cardiovascular outcomes. To evaluate tolerability and safety of prolonged-release nicotinic acid added to statin therapy in patients at high cardiovascular risk, the Niaspan®-induced HDL-Elevation for Optimizing Risk Control (NEMO) study focused on 179 patients with atherogenic dyslipidaemia treated under usual-care conditions. Flushing was the most common treatment-related adverse drug reaction (ADR) in Ireland (32% flushed during the first month), followed by cutaneous (6.2%) and gastrointestinal (3.9%) ADRs. Mean HDL-cholesterol increased by 20%. Half of the patients elected to continue treatment after the study. In conclusion, the tolerability and safety of prolonged-release nicotinic acid was similar in Ireland compared with the overall NEMO population. It is important to take practical measures to optimise patient compliance to minimise overall cardiovascular risk. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:210-14. CASE REPORTSyncope: role of CMR in evaluating the aetiology in a patient with dual pathology
We present a case in which the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allowed the full pathology underlying syncope to be established. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:215–16. NEWS & VIEWSNews Br J Cardiol 2008;15:185-8. HOT New data gathered via a survey undertaken on behalf of the British Cardiac Patients Association (BCPA) confirm not only that angina itself has an adverse impact on lifestyle, but that the side effects associated with some of the currently prescribed therapies for angina may be exacerbating the situation for patients. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:191-4. NEWS & VIEWSControversies in cardiovascular care
The Primary Care Cardiovascular Society (PCCS) teamed up with the South East Wales Cardiac Network for the first joint regional meeting of the Society. ‘Controversies in Cardiovascular Care’ was a great success attended by over 120 healthcare professionals working in cardiac services across Wales. The programme stimulated much lively discussion and debate. The combination of providing a regional focus to the PCCS’ well-established meeting format, with unrestricted support from industry, proved a winning formula with delegates, who called for it to become an annual event. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:189. HOT We continue our series in which Consultant Interventionist Dr Michael Norell takes a sideways look at life in the cath lab… and beyond. In this column, he considers the world of dietary advice. Br J Cardiol 2008;15:196-7. |
|
